When organizations build their complex-care and rising-risk lists, they sort by chronic medical conditions: diabetes, heart failure, COPD. They tend to treat behavioral health as a separate category — a different department, a different budget, someone else’s problem.
That separation is one of the most expensive mistakes in population health, and the data on it is striking.
1. The multiplier
A behavioral health condition layered on a chronic medical one doesn’t add cost. It multiplies it.
Milliman’s analysis of medical and behavioral claims found that the total cost of care for patients with both a chronic medical condition and a comorbid mental-health or substance-use disorder runs two to three times higher, on average, than for patients with the medical condition alone.
The same body of work estimated tens of billions in additional annual spending attributable to behavioral comorbidities — and, crucially, that much of that excess is medical spend, not behavioral spend.
2. Why the cost shows up on the medical side
This is the part that breaks most stratification logic. An untreated depression or anxiety disorder does not mainly drive up psychiatric costs — it drives up the cost of the diabetes, the heart failure, the COPD.
Adherence slips. Self-management fails. Avoidable admissions rise. The behavioral condition is the accelerant; the medical condition is what burns. A model looking only at medical claims sees an “uncontrolled diabetic” and misses the reason.
3. The identification gap
Behavioral health comorbidity is systematically under-captured. Many patients with these conditions never receive a behavioral diagnosis on a claim — they go unscreened, untreated, or are treated only on a self-pay basis — so they are invisible to a model built on claims data.
That means the highest-leverage patients in your panel may be precisely the ones your risk model cannot see, because the defining condition was never coded.
4. This is an impactability goldmine
The behavioral-health comorbid patient is often both high-cost and highly impactable — a rare combination.
Recall the core lesson of impactability: the best targets are patients where intervention actually changes the trajectory. Comorbid behavioral health fits perfectly. The excess medical cost is driven by something addressable — integrated behavioral support, care coordination, medication management.
Milliman’s work suggests effective integration could save tens of billions annually across the system. For an individual ACO or plan, that is the difference between a high-cost patient you simply absorb and one whose curve you can actually bend.
5. What to do operationally
Three moves: screen for behavioral health as part of complex-care identification rather than as an afterthought; flag patients whose medical utilization is high relative to their documented medical burden (often a behavioral driver hiding underneath); and build at least a basic integrated-care pathway so a flagged patient has somewhere to go.
You do not need a full collaborative-care build to start. You need to stop treating the behavioral signal as out of scope.
Final Thoughts
The patients who quietly wreck a value-based budget are frequently not the most medically complex on paper — they are the ones whose unaddressed behavioral health is silently inflating everything else.
As someone trained as a physician who later worked in audit and strategy, I would argue this is one of the clearest cases where the standard risk model and clinical reality diverge. If your complex-care strategy treats behavioral health as a separate lane, you are leaving both outcomes and savings on the table — two to three times over.
If your complex-care identification sorts by medical conditions and treats behavioral health as someone else’s budget, you’re missing the cost multiplier hiding in your highest-need patients. At HealtheNomics I help organizations integrate behavioral signals into identification — so the patients driving your spend stop being invisible.
Explore the services: https://healthenomics.com/services-2/
Request a strategy conversation: https://healthenomics.com/contact-us/
Connect on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/muhammad-ayoub-ashraf/
Website: https://www.drayoubashraf.com
Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@HealtheNomics
